Normalize the scope
Use the same workflow, claim population, completion definition, access, evidence, measurement period, and human support.
Evidence-based comparison
SuperDial is built around calls. LunaBill is built to finish the claim.
LunaBill works the whole claim: payer portals, calls, denials, appeals, resubmissions, and posting, with a published named health-system result and performance pricing of 1.5% of net collections recovered. SuperDial's public materials center on outbound healthcare voice agents for calling workflows.
HIPAA compliantSOC 2 Type IOutcome-based
Public-claims comparison
Where LunaBill leads on the public record.
DimensionLunaBillSuperDial
Public positioning
End-to-end AR system built to finish the claim
Outbound healthcare voice agents
Publicly listed workflow scope
Portals, payer calls, denials, appeals, resubmissions, posting
Eligibility, prior authorization, claim follow-up, credentialing, enrollment, custom calls
Named customer proof
Nutex Health, a 24-campus health system: $32M+ of AR worked in 30 days; 45 → 7 days in AR on the 60+ day commercial cohort
Request a named, cohort-defined result
Published pricing
1.5% of net collections recovered. $0 upfront, no license or implementation fees. No recovery, no fee.
Confirm directly with the vendor
Published time to live
48-hour go-live target; BAA typically executed in under a day
Confirm directly with the vendor
What to verify in both demos
Your integrations, eligible actions, exceptions, and measured results on your own claims
Your call paths, exceptions, pricing, and measured results on your own claims
Practical operating model
One cohort. One scorecard. Same rules.
Run competing approaches against identical work and count complete, accurate outcomes together with failures and human effort.
Test the failure paths
Include unusual payers, missing data, dropped calls, conflicting statuses, unsupported actions, and handoffs, not only happy paths.
Score the whole operation
Compare complete outcomes, accuracy, turnaround, exceptions, write-back, controls, implementation burden, and total cost.
Comparison disclosure
LunaBill has a commercial interest.
This comparison is published for LunaBill and is not an independent ranking. Product scope is limited to public primary sources; buyers should verify every material capability on their own workflow.
Review the source and methodologyBuyer questions
What teams ask before a pilot.
What is lunabill vs superdial?
LunaBill works the whole claim: payer portals, calls, denials, appeals, resubmissions, and posting, with a published named health-system result and performance pricing of 1.5% of net collections recovered. SuperDial's public materials center on outbound healthcare voice agents for calling workflows.
What should buyers know about published proof?
LunaBill publishes a named cohort: a 24-campus health system worked $32M+ of AR in 30 days, and 60+ day commercial claims moved from 45 to 7 days in AR. Ask any vendor for an equivalent named, cohort-defined result.
What should buyers know about aligned pricing?
LunaBill's published pricing is 1.5% of net collections recovered, with nothing upfront and no fee when nothing is recovered. Confirm how any alternative charges when a claim is worked but never resolved.
What should buyers know about where the work lands?
LunaBill returns dispositions, references, and next actions to the systems teams already run, publicly listing Epic, Cerner, GoRev, Waystar, and Availity. Verify the write-back path in both demos on your own claims.
How should LunaBill be evaluated for lunabill vs superdial?
Use a defined cohort from your own operation, document the baseline and allowed actions, inspect complete and failed outcomes, include human exception work, and agree on expansion criteria before the pilot begins.
Test the real workflow
Bring one queue. Measure the result.
Start with your payer mix, your claims, and one clear baseline.